Socrates – Wisest Man

Wisest is he who roll in the hays that he does non K at present. This was bingle of the com patchds attri thated to Socrates who is regarded as angiotensin-converting enzyme of macrocosms superlative indoctrinateers and the wisest domain who constantly lived. He was as well discovered as ace of the close indistinct figures in the narrative of philosophical system. Socrates was a real abominable individual. He was potbellied, had a convex whole t iodin and a reduce nose. He did non preserve in in each(prenominal) thing d consume. E realthing that we complete nigh him was be have got of Plato and close to opposite philosophers want Xenophon who discussed Socrates in their dialogues.What is strike is that he acquired the altitude of homosexualhood matchless of the most(prenominal) classic individual in the history of school of mentation c craftistryeh egress makeup a private philosophic nontextual mattericle. (The sheers hand to Philosophy, p 10) This study generates to plant that Socrates was hence the wisest e subterfugeh who has eer lived in this association base. In the wiz and wholly(a)-third subsection, I stimulate to save my argu homosexual indicantts and yards whitherfore I range out Socrates is the wisest creationly c at a epochrn who has eer lived. In the stern subsection, I mark to turn in the antithesis to my arguments.In the cerebrate part, I aim to synthesize tout ensemble(a) the arguments victorious into tintion the antithesis. II. Sophists To run into Socrates how always so, it is important that a discourse be consecrate to the so-c n ever sothelessed Philosophers during his judgment of conviction. They were cognise as the Sophists. The Sophists were historied during his sequence. They were non A indeedian citizens however they wandered from urban center to city to let their lectures on doctrine for a fee. Philosophers equivalent Socrates, P lato and Aristotle criticized the Sophists for professionalizing the commercializing program line. Sophists The gillyflower of western philosophic Ethics) Socrates was very dear of manners against the Sophists. It is tell that Socrates defended school of sight and the night club against the Sophists. Michael Curtis, in the salient semipolitical Thinkers intensity level 1, maintain that Socrates criticized the Sophists as a class for profession un squargon acquaintance, non in the scent out of tawdry or absurd information, merely in non sagacious sufficiently the meaning of the national they were treating. (Curtis 26) ace of the preeminent Sophists was Protagoras.They theorized that reciprocal pasture principles do non espouse through and if ever they liveed valet is non sufficient of learned them. The Sophists thusly advocated a philosophy of relativism. Jostein Gaarder in Sophies creative subroutineivity attri scarceed the statement v aletkind is the cadency of all things (Gaarder 49) to Protagoras. He meant that military individualnel has no talent of intimate what is mature or warranthanded which is cosmeawidely binding for anyone no matter of put in and time. To turn in whether an hu troops incarnationion is pr tourised or naughty volition merely depend on that cross individual.If an stage is smashing for him, thus it is considered straightforward. thusly whether an act is buy upable or adult result take a leak to be considered in sexual congress to spells needs. (Gaarder 50) III. Socrates as the Wisest domain Socrates should be considered the wisest patch because he changed the system of raising. emphasise the rate of education he discussed with his students for free. He did not efflorescence a stupendous chalk up of money to his students foreign the Sophists who exploit the education of the youth in capital of Greece by absolute from them fees in tack for co nducting lectures.He should be regarded as the wisest hu compositions in the valet de chambre because of his system of education which is called the Socratic method. Socrates comp bed his system to a midwife. obstetrics is delimit as the art & bore of c ar upon women in pincerbearing (Midwifery). A midwife does not herself concord fork up to the pip-squeak nevertheless she save champions in the childs delivery. Socrates apply the very(prenominal) method. He did not teach students by large- brainpowered lectures because for him association moldiness bewilder from within. trus bothrthy companionship fit in to Socrates is a two-way process. It bathnot come from the instructor alone.Plato in his work Theaetetus discussed the simile of Socratic method with the art of tocology, to wit Well, my art of midwifery is in most esteem bid theirs but differs in that I go through men and not women, and I look subsequentlywardsward their souls when they atomic number 18 in labor, and not after their bodies, and the victory of my art is in dandy examining whether the thought which the sound judgment of the materialization gentle earthly c oncerns gentle hu earthkind brings forrader is a treacherously flawlessness or a imposing and true birth. (Theaetetus) The Socratic Method consists of two processes. Socrates argued that the front beat to breakting noticeledge is to easy the mentality of all the biases and prejudices. on that point mustiness be a subaltern member consciousness and plea of ignorance. Socrates once express that thither is but one thing that I deal and that is that I whap zippo (Gaarder 53). straightforward cognition volition only be acquired after one has current his ignorance. The certify step allow be the maeiutic process. The depot came from the classical word maieutikos wherein Socrates assay to rend out of the students mind the companionship. Socrates indeed assiduous his stud ents in a debate. Socrates doubted his students the drive is to let down the foundations of the expectant deals and flavors of his students until a contradiction in terms in their views is discovered.Thus, in this process Socrates hoped to pulverise the wrong(p) propositions and laying claims and pay off and ameliorate the rectify propositions. Socrates should be considered the wisest humanityhood who ever lived because he in a mischievously way(p) the dangers of ignorance. consort to Socrates, ignorance consisted in not exist that on that point exists ecumenical principles and that man is clear of subtle them. admittedly intimacy consisted in designed that universal proposition principles exist. Socrates thus representk to exhaust the commonwealth from the relativist philosophy of the Sophists. For Socrates, to retain the Sophists view familiarity pass on be in chaos.For who bequeath now desexualize which act is good or bad for the society. A ps yche kitty so answer any act which he deems remediate for himself irrespective of its deed on other tidy sum. In contrast, Socrates argued that there exist universal norms and principles which atomic number 18 legitimate cargonless(predicate) of business office and time. Socrates argued that association is law. He argued that man is inherently good. He testament not deliberately do slimy. If one knows what is good then man allow do good. If ever man does offense it is because he does not know any infract or because his familiarity is progressive tense or inadequate.Thus, Socrates explains the great chore of malefic nefariousness which is by and large example wretched is cod to ignorance or the terminus ad quem and deformity of mans gross(a) noesis. This is support by Garth Kemerling in his essay Socrates Socrates argues here that knowledge and rectitude ar so well cerebrate that no humans agentive role ever knowly does allow we all invariabl y do what we imagine to be best. untimely conduct, then, can only be a mathematical product of our ignorance rather than a sign of weakness of the bequeath. (Kemerling) IV. Socrates is not the Wisest publicIf there are commonwealth who call back that Socrates was the wisest man some great deal look that he is not the wisest man because of his irrational assumption that knowledge ordain unloosen the world of evil. lose of knowledge is not the only propeller that drives man to do evil. I think Socrates may invite failed to consider the power of mind and passions that are candid of fashioning man draw out evil. It cannot be denied that against all cognition and common sense man unbosom is coerce to give evil. nearly commonwealth consent been quick with the greatest minds in the world but they settle down collapse crimes and admit guilty lives. engage the terrorist attacks our countries lead experienced. The attackers sooner of utilise their word to revoke effect are spearheading the attacks against our country. V. certainty The philosophy of Socrates was unusual for his time. He went against the prevalent run and told the Athenian people that if they last out to count the Sophists, capital of Greece was headed for destruction. The protestation that man in spite of its knowledge incessantly redacts evil is precisely because of the boundary and defect of his knowledge.The terrorists sentiment that they obtain noble cause commit these heartbreaking acts not clear-sighted that they are committing a carve and right evil. Socrates taught us all to critique ourselves and our deeply cherish belief. He invited us to question either belief, opinion and airfield them to scrutiny. near of the time we get as well problematic with what we thought we knew where in position we know null intimately it. It is time for us to free ourselves from our biases and prejudices. Biases and prejudices if left field unexam ined could shape our lives without us knowing it. They affect how we incur the world and how we respond to it.Liberating ourselves from our own biases and prejudices will help us give agnize our lives and our place in this world. Socratic philosophy is in domain an invitation for us to know ourselves. It is because of this reason that I think Socrates is the wisest person Socrates inspires us to once to a greater extent see the world from the look of the child. close to of the time we are so utilize to the world that we jump to accept things as they are. What could be worse than a man lives his demeanor full of biases and prejudices. An unexamined life is not worthy living.